Oftentimes large firm brokers receive forgivable loans to join a firm, or retention bonuses for staying, that require the broker to stay at the firm a number of years, or be forced to return the funds if he or she leaves. Typically, when a broker leaves a firm and owes money pursuant to one of these notes, the firm must file an arbitration claim against the broker before FINRA Dispute Resolution. The arbitration process takes time, although FINRA recently changed its procedures for note cases to expedite them. And, of course, if a broker has a dispute with his firm about his employment, those cases must go to arbitration as well.
Last week, Investment News reported on Merrill Lynch's new strategy for collecting on their loans from brokers who leave the company. They're going to court. It seems that the loans given to brokers for staying with the firm following the acquisition by Bank of America were written not by the broker-dealer, but by Merrill Lynch International Finance, Inc., which is not a broker-dealer. MLIF seeks to collect on the loans, and is filing the cases in court in New York. I agree with the lawyers quoted in the article that Merrill's strategy is clever. It seems they've found a way to have their cake and eat it too. This underscores the need for brokers to understand the deals they're getting into - the good, the bad, and the ugly.
